Addressing Further Issues… – The Album Project

It has been brought to my attention by now 2 people and counting (at the time of writing), that some of you lovely people who have seen us perform and who follow us across social media, have received personal messages from a disgruntled former member of The Album Project.

I am, as a general rule of thumb, decidedly against the airing of dirty linen in public. It’s an unedifying spectacle akin to watching a couple of chimps slinging lumps of shite at each other. As spectator sports go, I’d rather watch the upcoming 6 Nations this weekend. Or shin kicking. Or the national paint drying championships.

The problem here is that these messages now follow on from recent developments which we have found ourselves having to address in the form of firstly, a banner disclaimer across our website, and then latterly a personal statement from me only a couple of days ago. The disclaimer was, in part, instigated by me being informed of the first message being received. The second message was forwarded to me today, and this has necessitated the need for me to write yet another blog piece. It’s all becoming rather tiresome and tedious. I feel fairly confident that others have received a similarly ‘cut-and-paste’ missive into their inboxes. It’s this knowledge that has forced me to take all of the statements made in the messages and address them here:

“This is all very sad – It’s Simon having a go at me!” Nope… in fact current and former members of TAP and our affiliates have mentioned that they’ve never seen anything posted anywhere to corroborate this statement. I have spoken to as many of my fellow TAP band mates as I can to explain why circumstances have panned out this way. I have never, ever gone on to social media to bemoan the situation or have a good cry about it.

“I don’t even know why I’m not in TAP any more.” This is false. A conversation was had over the phone, lasting around 45 minutes, where the reasons were given. I am not going to expand on what these reasons were. But the explanation was perfectly clear. To refute this smacks of a childish self-denial.

“I’m booked as JK’s Chameleon to play a gig in 2 weeks at Goring, where I’ve always delt [sic] with the promoter.” This is true, I have never been involved in the booking of any gigs at this particular venue. I was recently invited by one of the venue promotion team to pop by for a chat on my way home from work. It was good to catch up, explain the band was on hiatus and had gone through a personnel change, and that maybe we’d able to perform there once more in the future. All very cordial and noncommittal on both sides. We’ve not been in touch since.

“They chose to use the fact that I was a founding member of TAP, and have co-run it for 3 years, to promote the gig. the [sic] band (JK’s Chameleon) includes all TAP players including [name/s mentioned] when we do Dire Straits later in the year, only the drummer is different – go figure!” I think it’s important to make the distinction here that the emphasis is on “a” founding member, and on “co-run” for 3 years. A simple reading of any of the advertising for this band’s forthcoming gigs, either on its own pages or the venue’s or others, will see the individual categorically stating they were “The Founder Member” or simply “Founder Member”. This barely disguised narcissism occurs time and again and this rewriting of history is misleading, duplicitous and really rather silly. To quote a member of TAP, “[he] is entitled to use his history/legacy as part of the band in his future endeavors. That’s fair enough. Mentioning it is fine. Mentioning how he’s done it is not. I think saying the band is the same, except the drummer is really unprofessional.” To then blame the venue/promoter/media etc for proliferating these inaccurate and misleading statements is utterly disingenuous as the responsibility for the wording of any publicity should always be signed off by the individual booking events through them. Mis-statements can be easily and quickly rectified if there is a will to do so. Unless of course there is an ulterior motive. Advertising yourself as “The Album Experience” does demonstrate a pretty clear intent…

“If I could post on the TAP group I would but Simon had blocked me… after all I’ve done [in running it] for the last 3 years. Sad.” The initial part of this statement is true. After I had taken the decision, as was my prerogative, to part ways and take things in a new direction, the individual concerned took it upon themselves to post a thinly veiled attack on me onto the aforementioned Facebook page, have a whinge about what had happened, portray themselves as a hapless victim, and then go to some length to advertise their new band plus gig dates all over that post without first having the courtesy to approach the page admin. The post was therefore removed, the individual blocked. Try demonstrating that brand of petulant behaviour on any other group page you may follow, see what happens. My bet is the result won’t be too dissimilar.The part about “running it” also had me confused. Did this mean running the Facebook page? If so, not true. It was set up by me, the individual was added as an admin at a later date at his request. This admin right was recently removed by me after I had made the decision to go on hiatus for the Winter. This was so that I could control the release of any announcement in the way I saw fit at the time of my choosing. To control the narrative without it being obfuscated by a meandering semi coherent ramble. However, “running it” could also have been referring to TAP itself. I would encourage you to treat that particular reality accordingly.

“Folks should know the truth. I am not booking myself as TAP however there are several others out there who are! https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/tompjames/collaborate-the-album-project” That’s a pretty brave statement to kick this final couple of sentences off. And it is really why I’ve had to address things in this manner. The Album Project, by name, is plastered all over the events as a selling tool. Fair enough, up to a point. It’s the implication that there will still be a TAP feel or vibe to the shows, as though it is TAP in all but name (and drummer) that is misleading. There are a few top notch players involved, some really great guys I’ve been privileged to play with previously and hopefully will play with again in the future of TAP. But it’s a different band! And to say the individual isn’t booking out as TAP is patently false, the evidence is there if you look for it – myself and others found it and have proof of it.

As for the statement that there are several others out there booking out as The Album Project, I had no idea as to the veracity of that claim. It could well be as stated, and I was intrigued enough to do a Google search, something I don’t actually recall ever having done before, although I may well have done back in the early days. The results were mostly of us, links to our Facebook page, YouTube videos, website hits etc etc. Then there was a jazz album by Various Artists released in 1977, a site for prettying up your scrap album, a site you can vote for your favourite classic album, and then also the site given as a link above. This goes to a Kickstarter page for a band named Collaborate from Southampton, UK. They want to raise funds to record an album of self penned Christian worship songs. And good luck to them, I hope they smash it! But as you can see, it’s not relevant to the argument of the individual making it. To suggest otherwise is at the very least misleading, and at worst a deliberate falsehood.

So, if you’re still reading this piece, please accept my sincere apologies for having put you through this! We live in strange times, where “Alternative Facts” are given credence when they should in fact be treated in the appropriate manner. If you have in fact received a Trumpian styled message yourself, then you do now at least have enough of the other side of the story.

I’m sorry to have taken up your time, thanks again for your continued support.

Onwards!

Simon